Political Disagreement and Uncertainty: Examining the Interplay of Political Talk and News Use in Online and Offline Environments

Authors

  • Bumsoo Kim The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
  • Matthew Barnidge The University of Alabama

Keywords:

political disagreement, uncertainty, social media, news use, political talk, political discussion, communication mediation model

Abstract

Contrary to popular arguments about “echo chambers” and “filter bubbles,” evidence shows that social media tend to promote exposure to political disagreement. But if this disagreement has little to no effect on individuals’ attitudes and opinions, the democratic benefits of this increased exposure could be limited. This study empirically investigates whether exposure to political disagreement in social media versus face-to-face settings has differential effects on individuals’ uncertainty about their political opinions and beliefs. In doing so, the paper accounts for the interplay in news use and political discussion in these two settings. The results show (a) differences in the relationship between political disagreement and uncertainty in social media and face-to-face settings and (b) considerable overlap in discussion and reflection processes between these two settings. Results are discussed in light of ongoing conversations about the democratic benefits of political disagreement.

Author Biographies

Bumsoo Kim, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel

Bumsoo Kim is a postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Communication and Journalism at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Matthew Barnidge, The University of Alabama

Matthew Barnidge is an assistant professor at the Journalism and Creative Media at the University of Alabama.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-31